Tumore allo stomaco: interventi chirurgici eseguiti in un anno

Indice

• Descrizione indicatore
• Come si legge
• Fonte del dato
• Valutazione istituzionale
• Altre informazioni

Descrizione indicatore

L’indicatore ci consente di calcolare il numero di interventi chirurgici per tumori maligni dello stomaco eseguiti in un anno in una struttura ospedaliera.

Questo numero rappresenta il "volume" di interventi (indicatore di "volume").

Come si legge

L’indicatore si riferisce al grado di "competenza" e di "sicurezza" delle cure prestate.

Più alto è il numero di interventi chirurgici per tumori maligni dello stomaco eseguiti in una struttura ospedaliera, maggiore è il grado di esperienza della struttura stessa e la sicurezza del trattamento offerto.

Fonte del dato

Programma Nazionale Esiti 2024.
Confronto tra strutture calcolato su dati 2023.

Nota bene: per tener conto di errori nell’attribuzione di condizioni/interventi a singoli ospedali, sono state escluse dalle analisi tutte le strutture con volumi di attività molto bassi in relazione alla condizione considerata (volume di attività minimo 5 casi/anno).

Valutazione istituzionale

Il Gruppo di lavoro del Programma Nazionale Esiti ha stabilito che un ospedale dovrebbe eseguire almeno 40 interventi all’anno per tumore maligno allo stomaco.
 
Il semaforo è calcolato sulla base del seguente documento ufficiale:

• Gruppo di lavoro del Programma Nazionale Esiti. Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data. Epidemiol Prev. 2017 Sep-Dec;41(5-6 Suppl 2):1-128. doi: 10.19191/EP17.5-6S2.P001.100.

Consulta le strutture sanitarie che effettuano in un anno il maggior numero di interventi chirurgici per tumori allo stomaco Approfondisci anche gli altri indicatori relativi a:

• Tumore allo stomaco: Sopravvivenza a 30 giorni dall'intervento chirurgico

Altre informazioni

Codici ICD-9-CM selezionati
Sono inclusi tutti i ricoveri, in regime ordinario, con diagnosi principale o secondaria di tumore maligno allo stomaco (ICD-9-CM 151, 197.8) ed intervento principale o secondario di gastrectomia parziale o totale (ICD-9-CM 43.5-43.9) di resezione del retto (ICD-9-CM 48.49, 48.5, 48.6).  
Fonti scientifiche

• Gori D, Tedesco D, Goggi R, Lombardi R, Fantini MP. La relazione fra volumi e mortalità a 30 giorni nella chirurgia oncologica di esofago e stomaco: revisione della letteratura e metanalisi. Epidemiol Prev 2014;38(3-4):167-75.
• Gruen RL, Pitt V, Green S, Parkhill A, Campbell D, Jolley D. The effect of provider case volume on cancer mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59(3):192-211.
• Killeen SD, O'Sullivan MJ, Coffey JC, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP. Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures. Br J Surg 2005;92(4):389-402.
• Meyer HJ. The influence of case load and the extent of resection on the quality of treatment outcome in gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005;31(6):595-604.
• Pla R, Pons JMV, Gonzalez JR, Borras JM. Hay niveles assistenciales en cirurgia oncologica? Los que mas hacen, lo hacen mejor? In-forme sobre la relacion entre volumen de procedimientos y resultados en cirurgia oncologica. Barcelona, Agència d'Avaluaciò de Tecnologia i Recerca Mèdiques, CatSalut, Department de Sanitat i Seguretat Social, Generalitat de Catalunya, 2003, pp. 1-59.
• Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 2002:137(6):511-20.
• Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, Rennie DJ, Milstein A. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA 2000;283(9):1159-66.
• Bachmann MO, Alderson D, Edwards D et al. Cohort study in South and West England of the influence of specialization on the management and outcome of patients with oesophageal and gastric cancers. Br J Surg 2002;89(7):914-22. 
• Baré M, Cabrol J, Real J et al. In-hospital mortality after stomach cancer surgery in Spain and relationship with hospital volume of interventions. BMC Public Health 2009;9:312.
• Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Eng J Med 2002;346(15):1128-37. 
• Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Goldfaden A, Birkmeyer NJ, Stukel TA. Volume and process of care in high-risk cancer surgery. Cancer 2006;106(11):2476-81.
• Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA. Hospital volume and late survival after   cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2007;245(5):777-83.
• Bottcher K, Siewert JR, Roder JD, Busch R, Hermanek P, Meyer HJ. Risk of surgical therapy of stomach cancer in Germany. Results of the German 1992 Stomach Cancer Study. German Stomach Cancer Study group (‘92). Chirurg 1994;65(4):298-306.
• Callahan MA, Christos PJ, Gold HT, Mushlin AI, Daly JM. Influence of surgical sub-specialty training on in-hospital mortality for gastrectomy and colectomy patients. Ann Surg 2003;238(4):629-36; discussion 636-39.
• Damhuis RA, Meurs CJ, Dijkhuis CM, Stassen LP, Wiggers T. Hospital volume and post-operative mortality after resection for gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2002;28(4):401-05.
• de Gara CJ, Hanson J, Hamilton S. A population-based study of tumor-node relationship, resection margins, and surgeon volume on gastric cancer survival. Am J Surg 2003;186(1):23-27.
• Enzinger PC, Benedetti JK, Meyerhardt JA et al. Impact of hospital volume on recurrence and survival after surgery for gastric cancer. Ann Surg 2007;245(3):426-34.
• Finlayson EV, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study. Arch Surg 2003;138(7):721-5.
• Fujita T, Yamazaki Y. Influence of surgeon’s volume on early outcome after total gastrectomy. Eur J Surg 2002;168(10):535-38.
• Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and failure to rescue with high-risk surgery. Med Care 2011;49(12):1076-81.
• Gillison EW, Powell J, McConkey CC, Spychal RT. Surgical workload and outcome after resection for carcinoma of the oesophagus and cardia. Br J Surg 2002;89(3):344-48.
• Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Bass EB et al. Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189(1):46-56.
• Hannan EL, O’Donnell JF, Kilburn H Jr, Bernard HR, Yazici A. Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals. JAMA 1989;262(4):503-10.
• Hannan EL, Radzyner M, Rubin D, Dougherty J, Brennan MF. The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. Surgery 2002;131(1):6-15.
• Hansson LE, Ekstrom AM, Bergstrom R, Nyren O. Surgery for stomach cancer in a defined Swedish population: current practices and operative results. Swedish Gastric Cancer Study Group. Eur J Surg 2000;166(10):787-95.
• Hughes RG, Hunt SS, Luft HS. Effects of surgeon volume and hospital volume on quality of care in hospitals. Med Care 1987;25(6):489-503.
• Jensen LS, Bendixen A, Kehlet H. Organisation and early outcomes of major upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery in Denmark 1996-2004. Scand J Surg 2007; 96(1):41-45.
• Kelly JV, Hellinger FJ. Physician and hospital factors associated with mortality of surgical patients. Med Care 1986;24(9):785-800.
• Kim CG, Kwak EK, Lee SI. The relationship between hospital volume and outcome of gastrointestinal cancer surgery in Korea. J Surg Oncol 2011;104(2):116-23.
• Lin HC, Xirasagar S, Lee HC, Chai CY. Hospital volume and inpatient mortality after cancer-related gastrointestinal resections: the experience of an Asian country. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13(9):1182-88.
• Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC. The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes- perfect or selective-referral patterns? Health Serv Res 1987;22(2):157-82.
• Maerki SC, Luft HS, Hunt SS. Selecting categories of patients for regionalization. Implications of the relationship between volume and outcome. Med Care 1986;24(2):148-58.
• McCulloch P,Ward J, Tekkis PP; ASCOT group of surgeons; British Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Group. Mortality and morbidity in gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery: initial results of ASCOT multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ 2003;327(7425):1192-97.
• Nomura E, Tsukuma H, Ajiki W, Oshima A. Population-based study of relationship between hospital surgical volume and 5-year survival of stomach cancer patients in Osaka, Japan. Cancer Sci 2003;94(11):998-1002.
• Reid-Lombardo KM, Gay G, Patel-Parekh L, Ajani JA, Donohue JH; Gastric Patient Care Evaluation Group from the Commission on Cancer. Treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma may differ among hospital types in the United States, a report from the National Cancer Data Base. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11(4):410-20.
• Smith DL, Elting LS, Learn PA, Raut CP, Mansfield PF. Factors influencing the volume-outcome relationship in gastrectomies: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14(6):1846-52.
• Smith JK, McPhee JT, Hill JS et al. National outcomes after gastric resection for neoplasm. Arch Surg 2007;142(4):387-93.
• Thompson AM, Rapson T, Gilbert FJ, Park KG; Scottish Audit of Gastric Oesophageal Cancer. Hospital volume does not influence long-term survival of patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal or gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2007;94(5):578-84.
• Wainess RM, Dimick JB, Upchurch GR Jr, Cowan JA, Mulholland MW. Epidemiology of surgically treated gastric cancer in the United States, 1988-2000. J Gastrointest Surg 2003;7(7):879-83.
• Wenner J, Zilling T, Bladstrom A, Alvegard TA. The influence of surgical volume on hospital mortality and 5-year survival for carcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Anticancer Res 2005;25(1B):419-24.