Tumore al retto: interventi chirurgici eseguiti in un anno

Indice

• Descrizione indicatore
• Come si legge
• Fonte del dato
• Valutazione istituzionale
• Altre informazioni

Descrizione indicatore

L’indicatore ci consente di calcolare il numero di interventi chirurgici per tumori maligni al retto eseguiti in un anno in una struttura ospedaliera.

Questo numero rappresenta il "volume" di interventi (indicatore di "volume").

Come si legge

L’indicatore si riferisce al grado di "competenza" delle cure prestate.

Più alto è il numero di interventi chirurgici per tumori maligni al retto eseguiti in una struttura ospedaliera, maggiore è il grado di esperienza della struttura stessa.

Non costituisce un parametro di valutazione inerente l’esito delle cure prestate.

Fonte del dato

Programma Nazionale Esiti 2024.
Confronto tra strutture calcolato su dati 2023.

Nota bene: per tener conto di errori nell’attribuzione di condizioni/interventi a singoli ospedali, sono state escluse dalle analisi tutte le strutture con volumi di attività molto bassi in relazione alla condizione considerata (volume di attività minimo 5 casi/anno).

Valutazione istituzionale

Per questo indicatore non è presente un valore di riferimento istituzionale.
Consulta le strutture sanitarie che effettuano in un anno il maggior numero di interventi chirurgici per tumori al retto

Altre informazioni

Codici ICD-9-CM selezionati
Sono inclusi tutti i ricoveri, in regime ordinario, con diagnosi principale o secondaria di tumore maligno del retto (ICD-9-CM 154, 197.5) ed intervento principale o secondario di resezione del retto (ICD-9-CM 48.49, 48.5, 48.6).
Sono esclusi i ricoveri con intervento principale o secondario di asportazione parziale dell'intestino crasso o colectomia totale (ICD-9-CM 45.7, 45.8, 45.9, 46.03, 46.04, 46.1).

Il volume di ricoveri per interventi chirurgici è calcolato su base annuale, riferito all’anno di dimissione del ricovero.   
Fonti scientifiche

• Archampong D, Borowski DW, Dickinson HO. Impact of surgeon volume on outcomes of rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon 2010;8(6):341-52.
• Archampong D, Borowski D, Wille-Jørgensen P, Iversen LH. Workload and surgeon’s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;14(3):CD005391.
• Nugent E, Neary P. Rectal cancer surgery: volume-outcome analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010;25(12):1389-96. 

• van GijnW, Gooiker GA,Wouters MW, Post PN, Tollenaar RA, van de Velde CJ. Volume and outcome in colorectal cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2010;36 Suppl 1:S55-63.
• Gruen RL, Pitt V, Green S, Parkhill A, Campbell D, Jolley D. The effect of provider case volume on cancer mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59(3):192-211.
• Salz T, Sandler RS. The effect of hospital and surgeon volume on 
outcomes for rectal cancer surgery. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 
2008;6(11):1185-93. 

• Iversen LH, Harling H, Laurberg S, Wille-Jørgensen P. Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 1: short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 2007;9(1):28-37.
• Iversen LH, Harling H, Laurberg S, Wille-Jørgensen P. Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 2: long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 2007;9(1):38-46.
• Killeen SD, O’Sullivan MJ, Coffey JC, Kirwan WO, Redmond HP. Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures. Br J Surg 2005;92(4):389-402.
• Gandjour A, Bannerberg A, Lauterbach KW. Threshold volumes associated with higher survival in health care. Med Care 2003;41(10):1129-41.
• Pla R, Pons JMV, Gonzalez JR, Borras JM. Hay niveles assistenciales en cirurgia oncologica? Los que mas hacen, lo hacen mejor? In- forme sobre la relacion entre volumen de procedimientos y resultados en cirurgia oncologica. Barcelona, Agència d'Avaluaciò de Tecnologia i Recerca Mèdiques, CatSalut, Department de Sanitat i Seguretat Social, Generalitat de Catalunya, 2003, pp. 1-59.
• Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 2002:137(6):511-20.
• Hodgson DC, Fuchs CS, Ayanian JZ. Impact of patients and provider characteristics on the treatment and outcomes of colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93(7):501-15.
• Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Feinglass JM et al. Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(28):4626-33.
• Borowski DW, Kelly SB, Bradburn DM et al. Impact of surgeon volume and specialization on short-term outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2007;94(7):880-89.
• Borowski DW, Bradburn DM, Mills SJ et al. Volume-outcome analysis of colorectal cancer-related outcomes. Br J Surg 2010;97(9):1416-30.
• Carter D. Lothian and borders large bowel cancer project: immediate outcome after surgery. The consultant surgeons and pathologists of the Lothian and Borders Health Boards. Br J Surg 1995:82(7):888-90.
• Debes AJ, Storkson RH, Jacobsen MB. Curative rectal cancer surgery in a low-volume hospital: a quality assessment. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008;34(4):382-89.
• Engel J, Kerr J, Eckel R et al. Influence of hospital volume on local recurrence and survival in a population sample of rectal cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005; 31(5):512-20.
• Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Bass EB et al. Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 1999;189(1):46-56.
• Grabham JA, Coleman MG, Moss S, Thompson MR, Lane RHS. Wessex colorectal cancer audit: anastomotic leakage following elective anterior resection. Br J Surg 1996;83 Suppl 1:22-23.
• Hannan EL, Radzyner M, Rubin D, Dougherty J, Brennan MF. Influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer. Surgery 2002;131(1):6-15.
• Harling H, Bulow S,Moller LN, Jorgensen T; Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Hospital volume and outcome of rectal cancer surgery in Denmark 1994-99. Colorec- tal Dis 2005;7(1):90-95.
• Harmon JW, Tang DG, Gordon TA et al. Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann Surg 1999;230(3):404-11; discussion 411-13.
• Hermanek P,Mansmann U, Staimmer DS, Riedl S, Hermanek P. The German experience: the surgeon as a prognostic factor in colon and rectal cancer surgery. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2000;9(1):33-49.
• Ho V, Heslin MJ, Yun H, Howard L. Trends in hospital and surgeon volume and operative mortality for cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13(6):851-58. Hodgson DC, Fuchs CS, Ayanian JZ. Impact of patient and provider characteristics on the treatment and outcomes of colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93(7):501-15.
• Hodgson DC, Zhang W, Zaslavsky AM, Fuchs CS, Wright WE, Ayanian JZ. Relation of hospital volume to colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95(10):708-16.
• Holm T, Johansson H, Cedermark B, Ekelund G, Rutqvist LE. Influence of hospital- and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Br J Surg 1997;84(5):657-63.
• Kee F,Wilson RH, Harper C et al. Influence of hospital and clinician workload on survival from colorectal cancer: cohort study. BMJ 1999;318(7195):1381-55. Kressner M, Bohe M, Cedermark B et al. The impact of hospital volume on surgical outcome in patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2009;52(9):1542-49. Manchon-Walsh P, Borras JM, Espinas JA, Aliste L; Catalonian Rectal Cancer Group. Variability in the quality of rectal cancer care in public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain): clinical audit as a basis for action. Eur J Sur Oncol 2011;37(4):325-33.
• Martling A, Cedermark B, Johansson H, Rutqvist LE, Holm T. The surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2002;89(8):1008-13.
• Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U, Pross M, Gastinger I, Lippert H. Hospital caseload and the results achieved in patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2001;88(10):1397-402. Marwan K, Staples MP, Thursfield V, Bell SW. The rate of abdominoperineal resections for rectal cancer in the state of Victoria, Australia: a population-based study. Dis Colon Rectum 2010;53(12):1645-51.
• Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R. Population-based study of risk factors for postoperative death after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg 2006;93(4):498-503.
• McArdle C S, Hole DJ. Influence of volume and specialization on survival following surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2004;91(5):610-17.
• McGrath DR, Leong DC, Gibberd R, Armstrong B, Spigelman AD. Surgeon and hospital volume and the management of colorectal cancer patients in Australia. ANZ J Surg 2005;75(10):901-10.
• Meyerhardt JA, Tepper JE, Niedzwiecki D et al. Impact of hospital procedure volume on surgical operation and long-term outcomes in high-risk curatively resected rectal cancer: findings from the Intergroup 0114 Study. J Clin Oncol 2004;22(1):166-74. Ng VV, Tytherleigh MG, Fowler L, Farouk R. Subspecialisation and its effect on the management of rectal cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006;88(2):181-84.
• Parry JM, Collins S, Mathers J, Scott NA,Woodman CB. Influence of volume of work on the outcome of treatment for patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 1999;86(4):475-81.
• Penninckx F. Surgeon-related aspects of the treatment and outcome after radical resection for rectal cancer. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2001;64(3):258-62.
• Porter GA, Soskolne CL, YakimetsWW, Newman SC. Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer. Ann Surg 1998;227(2):157-67.
• Ptok H, Marusch F, Kuhn R, Gastinger I, Lippert H. Influence of hospital volume on the frequency of abdominoperineal resection and long-term oncological outcomes in low rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007;33(7):854-61.
• Purves H, Pietrobon R, Hervey S, Guller U, Miller W, Ludwig K. Relationship between surgeon caseload and sphincter preservation in patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48(2):195-202; discussion 202-04.
• Rabeneck L, Davila JA, Thompson M, El-Serag HB. Surgical volume and long-term survival following surgery for colorectal cancer in the Veterans Affairs Health-Care System. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99(4):668-75.
• Rogers SO Jr, Wolf RE, Zaslavsky AM, Wright WE, Ayanian JZ. Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2006;244(6):1003-11.
• Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, Cohen AM, Warren JL, Begg CB. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA 2000;284(23):3028-35.
• Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E, Cramer LD, Guillem JG, Bach PB, Begg CB. Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection. Ann Surg 2002;236(5):583-92.
• Simons AJ, Ker R, Groshen S et al. Variations in treatment of rectal cancer: the influence of hospital type and caseload. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40(6):641-46.
• Simunovic M, To T, Baxter N et al. Hospital procedure volume and teaching status do not influence treatment and outcome measures of rectal cancer surgery in a large general population. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4(3):324-30.
• Stocchi L, Nelson H, Sargent DJ et al. Impact of surgical and pathologic variables in rectal cancer: a United States community and cooperative group report. J Clin Oncol 2001;19(18):3895-902.
• Wibe A, Erikesen M, Syse A et al. Effect of hospital caseload on long-term outcome after standardization of rectal cancer surgery at a national level. Br J Surg 2005;92(2):217-24.
• Yasunaga H, Matsuyama Y, Ohe K; Japan Surgical Society. Volume-outcome relationship in rectal cancer surgery: a new perspective. Surg Today 2009;39(8):663-68.