Bypass aortocoronarico: interventi chirurgici eseguiti in un anno

Indice

• Descrizione indicatore
• Come si legge
• Fonte del dato
• Valutazione istituzionale
• Altre informazioni

Descrizione indicatore

L’indicatore ci consente di calcolare il numero di interventi chirurgici di bypass aorto-coronarico eseguiti in un anno in una struttura ospedaliera (indicatore di "volume").

Come si legge

L’indicatore si riferisce al grado di “competenza” e “sicurezza" delle cure prestate.

Più alto è il numero di interventi chirurgici di bypass aorto-coronarico eseguiti in una struttura ospedaliera, maggiore è il grado di esperienza della struttura stessa e la sicurezza del trattamento offerto.

Fonte del dato

Programma Nazionale Esiti 2023.
Confronto tra strutture calcolato su dati 2022.

Nota bene: per tener conto di errori nell’attribuzione di condizioni/interventi a singoli ospedali, sono state escluse dalle analisi tutte le strutture con volumi di attività molto bassi in relazione alla condizione considerata (volume di attività minimo 5 casi/anno).

Valutazione istituzionale

Il Ministero della salute ha stabilito che un ospedale dovrebbe eseguire almeno 180 interventi all’anno di bypass aortocoronarico.

Il semaforo è calcolato sulla base del seguente documento ufficiale:

• Programma Nazionale Esiti. Treemap: definizione e metodi. Edizione 2023. Sviluppato dall’Agenzia Nazionale per i Servizi Sanitari Regionali (Agenas) per conto del Ministero della Salute.
• Ministero della Salute. Decreto 2 aprile 2015. n.70.

Consulta le strutture sanitarie che effettuano in un anno il maggior numero di interventi chirurgici di Bypass aortocoronarico 
Approfondisci anche gli altri indicatori relativi a:

• Bypass aortocoronarico: Sopravvivenza a 30 giorni dall'intervento chirurgico

Altre informazioni

Codici ICD-9-CM selezionati
Criteri di eleggibilità
Sono inclusi tutti i ricoveri, in regime ordinario, con intervento di BPAC (codici ICD9-CM 36.10-36.19) in qualsiasi campo di procedura.
Il volume di ricoveri per interventi chirurgici è calcolato su base annuale, riferito all’anno di dimissione del ricovero.
 
Criteri di esclusione
Sono esclusi i ricoveri che presentino, in qualsiasi campo di procedura, gli interventi definiti dai seguenti codici ICD9-CM: 33.5, 33.6, 35, 36.9, 37.10, 37.11, 37.31, 37.32, 37.33, 37.4, 37.5, 38.04, 38.05, 38.14, 38.15, 38.34, 38.35, 38.45, 38.65, 38.85, 39.21, 39.22, 39.23, 39.54.
Fonti scientifiche

• Cerza F, Cicala SD, Bernardini F, et al. Relazione tra volumi di attività ed esiti dell’assistenza ospedaliera. Evidenze epidemiologiche a supporto del processo di revisione del Decreto del Ministero della Salute n. 70 del 2 aprile 2015. Recenti Prog Med 2022; 113: 114-22.
• Sepehripour AH, Athanasiou T. Is there a surgeon or hospital volume-outcome relationship in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013;16(2):202-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs448.
• Post PN, Kuijpers M, Ebels T, Zijlstra F. The relation between volume and outcome of coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2010;31(16):1985-92.
• Kalant N, Shrier I. Volume and outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: are more and less the same? Can J Cardiol 2004;20(1):81-6.
• Gandjour A, Bannerberg A, Lauterbach KW. Threshold volumes associated with higher survival in health care. Med Care 2003;41(10):1129-41.
• Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 2002:137(6):511-20.
• Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, Rennie DJ, Milstein A. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA 2000; 283(9):1159-66.
• Agostini M, Fino C, Torchio P et al. High OPCAB surgical volume improves mid-term event-free survival. Heart Surg Forum 2009;12(5):E250-55.
• Allareddy V, Allareddy V, Konety BR. Specificity of procedure volume and in-hospital mortality association. Ann Surg 2007;246(1):135-39.
• Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl JMed 2002;346(15):1128-37.
• Brown PP, Mack MJ, Simon AW et al. Comparing clinical outcomes in high-volume and low-volume off-pump coronary bypass operation programs. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72(3):S1009-15.
• Burns LR, Wholey DR. The effects of patient, hospital, and physician characteristics on length of stay and mortality. Med Care 1991;29(3):251-71.
• Carey JS, Danielsen B, Gold JP, Rossiter SJ. Procedure rates and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures in California and New York. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129(6):1276-82.
• Christian CK, Gustafson ML, Betensky RA, Daley J, Zinner MJ. The leapfrog volume criteria may fall short in identifying high-quality surgical centers. Annals of Surg 2003;238(4):447-55; discussion 455-57.
• Clark RE. Outcome as a function of annual coronary artery bypass graft volume. The Ad Hoc Committee on Cardiac Surgery Credentualing on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61(1):21-6.
• Farley DE, Ozminkowski RJ. Volume-outcome relationships and inhospital mortality: the effect of changes in volume over time. Med Care 1992;30(1):77-94.
• Ghali WA, Quan H, Brant R. Coronary artery bypass grafting in Canada: hospital mortality rates, 1992-1995. CMAJ 1998;159(8):926-30.
• Glance LG, Dick AW, Osler TM, Mukamel DB. The relation between surgeon volume and outcome following off-pump vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Chest 2005;128(2):829-37.
• Grumbach K, Anderson GM, Luft HS, Roos LL, Brook R. Regionalization of cardiac surgery in the United States and Canada. Geographic access, choice, and outcomes. JAMA 1995;274(16):1282-88.
• Hannan EL, Kilburn H Jr, Racz M, Shields E, Chassin MR. Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. JAMA 1994;271(10): 761-66.
• Hannan EL, Kilburn H Jr, Bernard H, O’Donnell JF, Lukacik G, Shields EP. Coronary artery bypass surgery: the relationship between inhospital mortality rate and surgical volume after controlling for clinical risk factors. Med Care 1991;29(11):1094-107.
• Hannan EL, O’Donnell JF, Kilburn H Jr, Bernard HR, Yazici A. Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals. JAMA 1989;262(4):503-10.
• Hannan EL, Siu AL, Kumar D, Kilburn H Jr, Chassin MR. The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in New York State. The role of surgeon volume. JAMA 1995;273(3):209-13.
• Hughes RG, Hunt SS, Luft HS. Effects of surgeon volume and hospital volume on quality of care in hospitals. Med Care 1987;25(6):489-503.
• Johnson AN. The relationship between volume, quality and outcome in hospital care delivery. Minnesota, University of Minnesota, 1988.
• Kelly JV, Hellinger FJ. Heart disease and hospital deaths: an empirical study. Health Serv Res 1987;22(3):369-95.
• Konety SH, Rosenthal GE, Vaughan-Sarrazin MS. Surgical volume and outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: does it matter? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137(5):1116-23.
• Lapar DJ, Mery CM, Kozower BD et al. The effect of surgeon volume on mortality for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 143(4):854-63.
• Leape LL, Hilborne LH, Park RE et al. The appropriateness of use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State. JAMA 1993;269(6):753-60.
• Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should opeartions be regionalised? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Eng J Med 1979; 301(25):1364-9.
• Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC. The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes- perfect or selective-referral patterns? Health Ser Res 1987;22(2):157-82.
• Maerki SC, Luft HS, Hunt SS. Selecting categories of patients for regionalization. Implications of the relationship between volume and outcome. Med Care 1986;24(2):148-58.
• Marcin JP, Li Z, Kravitz RL, Dai JJ, Rocke DM, Romano PS. The CABG surgery volume-outcome relationship: temporal trends and selection effects in California, 1998-2004. Health Serv Res 2008;43(1 Pt 1):174-92.
• Nallamothu BK, Saint S, Ramsey SD, Hofer TP, Vijan S, Eagle KA. The role of hospital volume in coronary artery bypass grafting: is more always better? J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38(7):1923-30.
• Plomondon ME, Casebeer AW, Schooley LM et al. Exploring the volume-outcome relationship for off-pump coronary artery bypass graft procedures. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81(2):547-53.
• Riley G, Lubitz J. Outcomes of surgery among the Medicare aged: surgical volume and mortality. Health Care Financ Rev 1985;7(1):37-47.
• Rosenfeld K, Luft HS, Garnick DW, McPhee SJ. Changes in patient characteristics and surgical outcomes for coronary artery bypass surgery 1972-82. Am J Public Health 1987;77(4):498-500.
• Showstack JA, Rosenfeld KE, Garnick DW, Luft HS, Schaffarzick RW, Fowles J. Association of volume with outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Scheduled vs nonscheduled operations. JAMA 1987;257(6):785-89. 
• Shroyer AL, Marshall G, Warner BA et al. No continuous relationship between Veterans Affairs hospital coronary artery bypass grafting surgical volume and operative mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61(1):17-20. 
• Sollano JA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ et al. Volume-outcome relationships in cardiovascular operations: New York State, 1990-1995. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:419-28; discussion 428-30. 
• Wu SC, Chien LN, Ng YY, Chu HF, Chen CC. Association of case volume with mortality of Chinese patients after coronary artery bypass grafting: Taiwan experience. Circ J 2005;69(11):1327-32. 
• Zelen J, Bilfinger TV, Anagnostopoulos CE. Coronary artery bypass grafting. The relationship of surgical volume, hospital location, and outcome. NY State J Med 1991;91:290-92.