Aneurisma dell'aorta addominale (non rotto): sopravvivenza a 30 giorni dall'intervento chirurgico

Indice

• Descrizione indicatore
• Come si legge
• Fonte del dato
• Valutazione istituzionale
• Altre informazioni

Descrizione indicatore

L'indicatore ci consente di calcolare la percentuale di pazienti sottoposti ad un intervento di riparazione di aneurisma non rotto dell’aorta addominale che sopravvive nei primi 30 giorni successivi all'intervento, rispetto al totale dei pazienti ricoverati per un intervento di riparazione di aneurisma non rotto dell’aorta addominale.

Come si legge

L’indicatore si riferisce al grado di "efficacia" delle cure prestate.

Più alto è il numero di pazienti sottoposti ad un intervento di riparazione di un aneurisma non rotto dell'aorta addominale che sopravvive nei 30 giorni successivi all’intervento, maggiore è il grado di efficacia e dunque di qualità dei trattamenti offerti dalla struttura ospedaliera.

Fonte del dato

Programma Nazionale Esiti 2023.
Confronto tra strutture calcolato su dati 2022.

Valutazione istituzionale

Il Ministero della Salute ha stabilito che la percentuale di sopravvivenza a 30 giorni dall'intervento dovrebbe essere almeno del 99%.
 
Il semaforo è calcolato sulla base dei seguenti documenti ufficiali:

• Ministero della Salute. Decreto 21 giugno 2016.
• Programma Nazionale Esiti. Treemap: definizione e metodi. Edizione 2016. Sviluppato dall’Agenzia Nazionale per i Servizi Sanitari Regionali (Agenas) per conto del Ministero della Salute.
• Programma Nazionale Esiti. Treemap: definizione e metodi. Edizione 2023. Sviluppato dall’Agenzia Nazionale per i Servizi Sanitari Regionali (Agenas) per conto del Ministero della Salute.

Consulta le strutture sanitarie che effettuano in un anno il maggior numero di interventi chirurgici per aneurisma dell’aorta addominale non rotto 
Approfondisci anche gli altri indicatori relativi a:

• Aneurisma dell’aorta addominale (non rotto): interventi chirurgici eseguiti in un anno

Altre informazioni

Codici ICD-9-CM selezionati
L’esito in studio è la sopravvivenza entro 30 giorni dalla data dell’intervento di riparazione dell’aneurisma non rotto dell’aorta addominale. L’accertamento dello stato in vita viene effettuato, sulla base del SIO, sia nel ricovero indice sia in eventuali ricoveri successivi del paziente entro 30 giorni e sulla base dell’Anagrafe Tributaria.
L’analisi è effettuata su base biennale.
L’evento viene attribuito alla struttura in cui è stato effettuato l’intervento.
 
Criteri di eleggibilità
Tutti i ricoveri per acuti, in regime ordinario, con diagnosi principale o secondaria di aneurisma dell’aorta addominale senza rottura (ICD-9-CM 441.4) e con le seguenti procedure in qualsiasi campo:

• Resezione dell'aorta con anastomosi (ICD-9-CM 38.34);
• Resezione dell’aorta addominale con sostituzione (ICD-9-CM 38.44);
• Altra asportazione dell’aorta addominale (ICD-9-CM 38.64);
• Impianto endovascolare di graft nell’aorta addominale (ICD-9-CM 39.71).

 
Criteri di esclusione

• Ricoveri di pazienti non residenti in Italia;
• Ricoveri di pazienti di età inferiore ai 18 e superiore ai 100 anni;
• Ricoveri per trasferimento da altra struttura.

Fonti scientifiche

• Cerza F, Cicala SD, Bernardini F, et al. Relazione tra volumi di attività ed esiti dell’assistenza ospedaliera. Evidenze epidemiologiche a supporto del processo di revisione del Decreto del Ministero della Salute n. 70 del 2 aprile 2015. Recenti Prog Med 2022; 113: 114-22.
• Philips P, Poku E, Essat M et al. Procedure Volume and the Association with Short-term Mortality Following Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in European Populations: A Systematic Review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017;53(1):77-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.10.007.
• Marlow NE, Barraclough B, Collier NA et al. Effect of hospital and surgeon volume on patient outcomes following treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010b;40(5):572-79.
• Troeng T. Volume versus outcome when treating abdominal aortic aneurysm electively – is there evidence to centralise? Scand J Surg 2008;97(2):154-59; discussion 159-60.
• Henebiens M, van den Broek TA, Vahl AC, Koelemay MJ. Relation between hospital volume and outcome of elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;33(3):285-92.
• Holt PJ, Poloniecki JD, Gerrard D, Loftus IM, Thompson MM. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the relationship between volume and outcome in abdomi- nal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg 2007a;94(4):395-403.
• Killeen SD, Andrews EJ, Redmond HP, Fulton GJ. Provider volume and outcomes for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, carotid endarterectomy, and lower extremity revascularization procedures. J Vasc Surg 2007;45(3):615-26.
• Young EL, Holt PJ, Poloniecki JD, Loftus IM, Thompson MM. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the relationship between surgeon annual caseload and mortality for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46(6):1287-94.
• Wilt TJ, Lederle FA, Macdonald R, Jonk YC, Rector TS, Kane RL. Comparison of endovascular and open surgical repairs for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2006;(144):1-113.
• Gandjour A, Bannerberg A, Lauterbach KW. Thresold volumes associated with higher survival in health care. Med Care 2003;41(10):1129-41.
• Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in healt care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 2002:137(6):511-20.
• Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, Rennie DJ, Milstein A. Selective referrak to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA 2000; 283(9):1159-66.
• AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA, Boland JP et al. Elective resection of 332 abdominal aortic aneurysm in a southern West-Virginia community during a recent five-year period. Surgery 1991;109(3 Pt 1):244-51.
• Allareddy V, Allareddy V, Konety BR. Specificity of procedure volume and in-hospital mortality association. Ann Surg 2007;246(1):135-39.
• Amundsen S, Skjaerven R, Trippestad A, Soreide O. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. Is there an association between surgical volume, surgical experience, hospital type and operative mortality? Members of the Norwegian Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Trial. Acta Chir Scan 1990;156(4):323-37; discussion 327-28.
• Bayly PJ, Matthews JN, Dobson PM, Price ML, Thomas DG. In-hospital mortality from abdominal aortic surgery in Great Britain and Ireland: Vascular Anaesthesia Society audit. Br J Surg 2001;88(5):687-92.
• Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Staiger DO. Operative mortality and procedure volume as predictors of subsequent hospital performance. Ann Surg 2006;243(3):411-17. Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Potential benefits of the new leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. Surgery 2004;135(6):569-75.
• Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Eng J Med 2002;346(15):1128-37.
• Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Eng J Med 2003; 349(22):2117-27.
• Bush Rl, Johnson Ml, Collins TC et al. Open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in VA hospitals. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202(4):577-87.
• Christian CK, Gustafson ML, Betensky RA, Daley J, Zinner MJ. The Leapfrog volume criteria may fall short in identifying high-quality surgical centers. Ann Surg 2003;238(4):447-55; discussion 455-57.
• Cronenwett JL, Birkmeyer JD. The Dartmouth atlas of vascular healthcare. Cardiovasc Surg 2000;8(6):409-10.
• Dardik A, Burleyson GP, Bowman H et al. Surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the state of Maryland: factors influencing outcome among 527 recent cases. J Vasc Surg 1998;28(3):413-20; discussion 420-21.
• Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr, Stanley JC, Henke PK, Pronovost PJ, Upchurch GR Jr. Surgeon specialty and provider volumes are related to outcome of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States. J Vasc Surg 2003a;38(4):739-44. Dimick JB, Pronovost PJ, Cowan JA, Aliawadi G, Upchurch GR Jr. The volume-outcome effect for abdominal aortic surgery: differences in case-mix or complications? Arch Surg 2002a;137(7):828-32.
• Dimick JB, Pronovost PJ, Cowan JA, Lipsett PA, Stanley JC, Upchurch GR Jr. Variation in postoperative complication rates after high-risk surgery in the United States. Surgery 2003b;134(4):534-40; discussion 540-41.
• Dimick JB, Pronovost PJ, Cowan JA Jr, Wainess RM, Upchurch GR Jr. Should older patients be selectively referred to high-volume centers for abdominal aortic sur- gery? Vascular 2004;12:51-56.
• Dimick JB, Stanley JC, Axelrod DA et al. Variation in death rate after abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy in the United States: impact of hospital volume, gender, and age. Ann Surg 2002b;235(4):579-85.
• Dueck AD, Kucey DS, Johnston KW, Alter D, Laupacis A. Long-term survival and temporal trends in patient and surgeon factors after elective and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. J Vasc Surg 2004;39(6):1261-67.
• Eckstein HH, Bruckner T, Heider P et al. The relationship between volume and outcome following elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in 131 German hospitals. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;34(3):260-66.
• Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Fraser I. Volume thresholds and hospital characteristics in the United States. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003;22(2):167-77.
• Goodney PP, Lucas FL, Birkmeyer JD. Should volume standards for cardiovascular surgery focus only on high-risk patients? Circulation 2003;107(3):384-87.
• Hannan EL, Kilbum H Jr, O’Donnell JF et al. A longitudinal analysis of the relation- ship between in-hospital mortality in New York State and the volume of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgeries performed. Health Serv Res 1992;27(4):517-42.
• Hannan EL, O’Donnell JF, Kilburn H Jr, Bernard HR, Yazici A. Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals. JAMA 1989;262(4):503-10.
• Hentschker CRM, Mennicken R. The volume-outcome relationship and minimum volume standards – empirical evidence for Germany. Health Econ 2015; 24(6):644-58.
• Holt PJE, Karthikesalingam A, Hofman D et al. Provider volume and long-term outcome after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 2012;99(5):6672.
• Holt PJE, Karthikesalingam A, Poloniecki JD, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM. Propensity scored analysis of outcomes after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 2010;97(4):496-503.
• Holt PJE, Poloniecki JD, Khalid U, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM. Effect of endovascular aneurysm repair on the volume-outcome relationship in aneurysm repair. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009;2(6):624-32.
• Holt PJ, Poloniecki JD, Loftus IM, Michaels JA, ThompsonMM. Epidemiological study of the relationship between volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in the UK from 2000 to 2005. Br J Surg 2007a;94(4):441-48.
• Health and Social Care Information Centre. Hospital Episode Statistics. Disponibile su: http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk.
• Huber TS, Seeger JM. Dartmouth atlas of vascular health care review: impact of hospital volume, surgeon volume, and training on outcome. J Vasc Surg 2001; 34(4):751-56.
• Jibawi A, Hanafy M, Guy A. Is there a minimum caseload that achieves acceptable operative mortality in abdominal aortic aneurysm operations? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;32(3):273-6.
• Kantonen I, Lepantalo M, Salenius JP, Matzke S, Luther M, Ylonen K. Mortality inabdominal aortic  aneurysm surgery – the effect of hospital volume, patient mix and surgeon’s case load. J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997;14(5):375-9.
• Karthikesalingam A, Holt PJ, Vidal-Diez A et al. The impact of endovascular aneurysm repair on mortality for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in England and the United States. J Vasc Surg 2016;64(2):321-27.e2.
• Katz DJ, Stanley JC, Zelenock GB. Operative mortality rates for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in Michigan: an eleven-year statewide experience. J Vasc Surg 1994;19(5):804-15; discussion 816-17.
• Kazmers A, Jacobs L, Perkins A, Lindenauer SM, Bates E. Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Veterans Affairs medical centers. J Vasc Surg 1996;23(2):191-200.
• Kelly JV, Hellinger FJ. Physician and hospital factors associated with mortality of surgical patients. Med Care 1986;24(9):785-800.
• Khuri SF, Daley J, HendersonWet al. Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 1999;230(3):414-29; discussion 429-32.
• Lawrence PF, Gazak C, Bhirangi L et al. The epidemiology of surgically repaired aneurysms in the United States. J Vasc Surg 1999;30(4):632-40.
• Luft HS, Hunt SS, Maerki SC. The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes perfect or selective-referral patterns? Health Serv Res 1987;22(2):157-82.
• Maerki SC, Luft HS, Hunt SS. Selecting categories of patients for regionalization. Implications of the relationship between volume and outcome. Med Care 1986;24(2):148-58.
• Manheim LM, Sohn MW, Feinglass J, UjikiM, Parker MA, Pearce WH. Hospital vascular surgery volume and proceduremortality rates in California, 1982-1994. J Vasc Surg 1998;28(1):45-56; discussion 56-58.
• Pearce WH, Parker MA, Feinglass J, Ujiki M, Manheim LM. The importance of surgeon volume and training in outcomes for vascular surgical procedures. J Vasc Surg 1999;29(5):768-76; discussion 777-78.
• Pilcher DB, Davis JH, Ashikaga T et al. Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm in an entire state over 7 1/2 years. Am J Surg 1980;139(4):487-94.
• Rigberg DA, Zingmond DS, McGoryML et al. Age stratified, perioperative, and one-year mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a statewide experience. J Vasc Surg 2006;43(2):224-29.
• Sollano JA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ et al. Volume-outcome relationships in cardiovascular operations: New York State, 1990-1995. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117(3):419-28; discussion 428-30.
• Trenner M, Haller B, Sollner H et al. Twelve years of the quality assurance registry on ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm of the German Vascular Society (DGG): Part 3: Predictors of the perioperative outcome with focus on annual caseload. Gefässchirurgie 2015;20 Suppl 1:32-44.
• Trivedi AN, Sequist TD, Ayanian JZ. Impact of hospital volume on racial disparities in cardiovascular procedure mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47(2):417-24.
• Tu JV, Austin PC, Johnston KW. The influence of surgical specialty training on the outcomes of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33(3):447-52.
• Urbach DR, Baxter NN. Does it matter what a hospital is “high volume” for? Specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations or surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data. BMJ 2004;328(7442):737-40.
• Urbach DR, Bell CM, Austin PC. Differences in operative mortality between high-and low-volume hospitals in Ontario for 5 major surgical procedures: estimating the number of lives potentially saved through regionalization. CMAJ 2003; 168(11):1409-14.
• Veith FJ, Goldsmith J, Leather RP, Hannan EL. The need for quality assurance in vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 1991;13(4):523-26.
• Ward MM, Jaana M,Wakefield DS et al.What would be the effect of referral to high-volume hospitals in a largely rural state? J Rural Health 2004;20(4):344-54.
• Webster P. Time to evaluate why high-volume hospitals have better surgical outcomes. CMAJ 2005;173(2):140.
• Wen SW, Simonovic M,Williams JI, Johnston KW, Naylor CD. Hospital volume, calendar age, and short term outcomes in patients undergoing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Ontario experience, 1988-92. J Epidemiol Community Health 1996;50(2):207-13.